Evolution of Phlebotomy
Course Objectives
- Describe how the profession of phlebotomy has evolved from historical bloodletting practices to modern evidence-based healthcare.
- Recognize the knowledge, skills, and professional behaviors that support competency, patient safety, and high-quality specimen collection.
- Apply principles of professionalism, patient-centered communication, ethical practice, and confidentiality to support safe and effective patient care.
Course Content
Course Creator: Kirsten Hermens NCMA-P
Total CE Hours: 1 Credit Hour
Pace Course #: 586-2107-24 until 9/30/2026 then
586-2705-26 until 9/30/2028
- Key Terms
- Bloodletting
- Therapeutic Phlebotomy
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Professional Competency
- Patient-Centered Care
- Specimen Quality
- Protected Health Information (PHI)
- HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
- Professionalism
- Lifelong Learning
Introduction
Key Terminology
Why the profession has evolved
Key Terminology
Why the profession has evolved
- Why study the evolution of phlebotomy
- The evolution of the profession
- What is bloodletting
- The four Humors
- Bloodletting methods
- Barbers and phlebotomy
- Famous bloodletting failures
- From bloodletting to therapeutic phlebotomy
- The four Humors
- Why it matters today
- Phlebotomy Today: The Modern Role of the Phlebotomist
- Phlebotomy Today
- The modern Role has expanded
- How modern practice has changed
- Why it matters today
- Phlebotomy Today
- The future of Phlebotomy
- Digital technology and animation
- Expanding access to care
- Advanced collection technology
- Faster testing and Future trending
- Will technology replace phlebotomists?
- Why it matters today
- Growing with the profession
- Why continuing education matters
- Building professional competency
- Foundational Knowledge
- Technical excellence
- Lifelong professional growth
- Professional readiness
- Why it matters today
- Building professional competency
- Why continuing education matters
- Professional Practice: Putting competency into practice
- Professionalism in phlebotomy
- Characteristics of a professional phlebotomist
- Providing excellent bedside manner
- Difficult patient encounters
- Patient Rights and Confidentiality: protecting patient trust
- Respecting Patient Rights
- Protecting patient trust
- Understanding Protected Health Information
- HIPAA in everyday practice
- Why it matters today
- The profession will continue to evolve
- The Modern Phlebotomist
- Respecting Patient Rights
References:
- World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guidelines on drawing blood: Best practices in phlebotomy. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44294
- Greenstone, B. H. (2010). History of bloodletting. British Columbia Medical Journal, 52(1), 12–14.
- National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). The four humors. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/shakespeare-and-the-four-humors/
- Vadakan, V. V. (2004). The asphyxiating and exsanguinating death of President George Washington. The Permanente Journal, 8(2), 78–79.
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2017). Collection of diagnostic venous blood specimens (7th ed., CLSI Standard GP41). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Collecting and labeling specimens from people with possible exposure to chemical agents. https://www.cdc.gov/laboratory-response-network/php/chemical/specimen-collection.html
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2020). Procedures for the collection of diagnostic capillary blood specimens(7th ed., CLSI Standard GP42). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
- Lippi, G., Chance, J. J., Church, S., Dazzi, P., Fontana, R., Giavarina, D., Grankvist, K., Huisman, W., Kouri, T., Palicka, V., Plebani, M., Sandberg, S., & Sikaris, K. (2011). Preanalytical quality improvement: From dream to reality. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49(7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.600
- Plebani, M. (2006). Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 44(6), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.123
- Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10027
- Nichols, J. H., Alter, D., Chen, Y., Isbell, T. S., Jacobs, E., Moore, N., Shajani-Yi, Z., & Grenache, D. G. (2020). AACC guidance document on management of point-of-care testing. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 5(4), 762–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa059
- Docherty, J. R., Mander, A. P., & colleagues. (2021). Microsampling technologies: Current applications and future directions. Bioanalysis, 13(16), 1275–1290.
- Hou, H., Zhang, R., & Li, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory. Clinica Chimica Acta, 559, 119724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.119724
- World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032705
- National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences. (2023). Standards for accredited and approved programs. https://www.naacls.org
- American Society for Clinical Pathology. (2023). Credential Maintenance Program (CMP). https://www.ascp.org
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office for Civil Rights. (2024). Health information privacy. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2024). Bloodborne pathogens standard (29 CFR §1910.1030). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/bloodborne-pathogens
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Science of improvement: How to improve. https://www.ihi.org
